_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Posted on: Saturday, August 31st 2024 at 3:00 am Written By: GreenMedInfo Research Group

Is your baby’s formula a nutritional lifeline or a chemical cocktail in disguise?

In a world where convenience often trumps health, millions of parents unknowingly feed their infants a cocktail of industrial chemicals, pesticides, and synthetic nutrients – all in the name of “nourishment.” But what if the very substance meant to sustain our most vulnerable population is actually setting them up for a lifetime of health issues? The truth about infant formula is far more complex and concerning than most realize, especially when compared to nature’s perfect food: breast milk.

Nature’s Perfect Food: The Unmatched Benefits of Breast Milk

Breast milk is a living, dynamic food perfectly tailored to each baby’s needs. It contains antibodies that boost the infant’s immune system, hormones that regulate appetite and metabolism, stem cells that aid in organ development, beneficial bacteria that colonize the gut microbiome, enzymes that aid digestion, growth factors that support brain and body development, anti-inflammatory compounds, natural pain relievers, and sleep-inducing compounds. Perhaps most importantly, breast milk provides a perfect balance of easily digestible nutrients that adapt to the baby’s changing needs.

One of the most remarkable aspects of breast milk that sets it apart from any synthetic alternative is the presence of species-specific exosomes. These tiny vesicles contain powerful microRNAs (miRNAs) that play a crucial role in regulating gene expression in the infant. As explained in Sayer Ji’s book “REGENERATE: Unlocking Your Body’s Radical Resilience,” these exosomes act as a form of epigenetic communication between mother and child, helping to fine-tune the baby’s development in ways that no artificial formula can replicate.1

The Not-So-Secret Ingredient: A Dash of Pesticide with Your Baby’s Bottle

When new parents lovingly prepare a bottle of formula for their infant, few imagine they might be serving up a dose of pesticide along with it. Yet, shockingly, that’s exactly what’s happening in households across America and beyond. The culprit? Cupric sulfate, a common ingredient in many infant formulas – including those labeled “organic.”

Cupric sulfate is classified as a fungicide, herbicide, and pesticide. It’s used to kill roots in plumbing systems and algae in ponds. So why on earth is it in baby formula? Manufacturers claim it’s a vital source of copper, an essential mineral for infant development. But at what cost?

Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo.com, has extensively researched this issue. He notes, “Used to kill fungus, aquatic plants and roots of plants, parasitic infections in aquarium fish and snails, as well as algae and bacteria such as Escherichia coli, cupric sulfate hardly sounds fit for human consumption, much less for infants”.2

The Chemical Cocktail in Your Baby’s “Nutrition”

Cupric sulfate is just the tip of the iceberg. A closer look at the ingredient lists of popular infant formulas reveals a disturbing array of synthetic chemicals masquerading as “nutrients”:

  1. Calcium Chloride: A salt classified as an “irritant” by EU safety standards
  2. Calcium Hydroxide: Known as “slaked lime,” it’s corrosive and used in sewage treatment
  3. Ferrous Sulfate: A byproduct of steel production
  4. Manganese Sulfate: Labeled “harmful” and “dangerous for the environment”
  5. Potassium Hydroxide: Also known as “caustic potash,” it’s corrosive and harmful
  6. Sodium Selenite: Classified as “very toxic” with a toxicity similar to sodium cyanide
  7. Zinc Sulfate: Another “harmful” ingredient “dangerous for the environment”

These ingredients aren’t just present in bargain-basement formulas. They’re found in premium “organic” brands too, hiding behind claims of being “earth-friendly” and “natural”.3

The Unintended Consequences: A Recipe for Poor Health

The inclusion of these synthetic and potentially harmful ingredients in infant formula isn’t just a matter of principle – it has real-world consequences for babies’ health. Research has linked formula feeding to increased risks of:

  1. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
  2. Childhood cancers, including leukemia and lymphoma
  3. Obesity and metabolic disorders later in life
  4. Respiratory infections and pneumonia
  5. Gastrointestinal issues, including necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants
  6. Type 1 diabetes
  7. Allergies and asthma
  8. Impaired cognitive development
  9. Cardiovascular problems
  10. Compromised immune function

A review published in the journal Archives of Disease In Childhood revealed a disturbing statistic: “Currently, suboptimal breastfeeding is associated with over a million deaths each year and 10% of the global disease burden in children”.4

Beyond Nutrition: The Holistic Advantages of Breastfeeding

The benefits of breastfeeding extend far beyond just nutritional superiority. Breastfeeding promotes bonding between mother and child, reduces the risk of postpartum depression in mothers, lowers the risk of breast and ovarian cancer in mothers, aids in postpartum weight loss, is economically advantageous, has a lower environmental impact compared to formula production and disposal, adapts to the baby’s changing needs, provides pain relief during medical procedures for infants, and supports optimal jaw and dental development in babies.

The Corporate Takeover of Infant Nutrition

How did we stray so far from nature’s perfect food? The answer lies in aggressive marketing by formula companies, often disguised as helpful information for new parents. These corporations have lobbied against breastfeeding promotion initiatives, provided free samples in hospitals, marketed formula as equivalent or superior to breast milk, targeted vulnerable populations in developing countries, created “follow-on” formulas to circumvent advertising restrictions, sponsored healthcare professionals and research to gain credibility, exploited parental anxieties about infant growth and development, promoted the idea that formula feeding equals modernity and progress, downplayed the risks associated with formula feeding, and capitalized on societal pressures that make breastfeeding challenging for many women.

Katherine Carroll, Executive Director of the National Health Federation, points out the troubling connection between government and private businesses in the infant formula industry: “The essence of the Deep State is ‘a combination of government and private businesses, working arm in arm to take advantage of the public.’ Here, that public is ‘mother and child'”.5

The Synthetic Vitamin E Dilemma

One particularly concerning ingredient found in many infant formulas is synthetic vitamin E. While natural vitamin E (RRR-α-tocopherol) is beneficial for infant development, the synthetic form (a mixture of eight different molecules) may pose risks.

A study published in the British Journal of Nutrition found that while the infant brain preferentially absorbs the natural form of vitamin E, it also accumulates some of the synthetic form. The researchers concluded, “These findings reveal that RRR-α-tocopherol is the predominant stereoisomer in infant brain. These data also indicate that the infant brain discriminates against the synthetic 2R stereoisomers, but is unable to do so completely”.6

This accumulation of synthetic vitamin E in the infant brain is concerning because it may disrupt normal gene expression and potentially affect neurodevelopment. The synthetic form is derived from petrochemicals and has been shown to have different biological effects than natural vitamin E, particularly in terms of gene regulation.7

Reclaiming Our Biological Birthright: Supporting Breastfeeding

To reverse the trend of declining breastfeeding rates and increasing reliance on formula, we need a multi-faceted approach:

  1. Improved maternity leave policies to support breastfeeding
  2. Better education for healthcare providers on lactation support
  3. Public health campaigns highlighting the risks of formula and benefits of breastfeeding
  4. Stricter regulation of formula marketing practices
  5. Investment in milk banks and breast milk sharing networks
  6. Workplace support for pumping and breastfeeding
  7. Cultural shift to normalize breastfeeding in public
  8. Peer support programs for new mothers
  9. Integration of lactation support into prenatal care
  10. Research into overcoming common breastfeeding challenges

When Breast Isn’t Possible: Safer Alternatives to Commercial Formula

While breast milk is undoubtedly superior, there are situations where breastfeeding isn’t possible. In these cases, safer alternatives to commercial formula should be explored. One promising option is goat milk-based formula.

Recent research has shown that goat milk formula (GMF) might offer distinct advantages over cow’s milk formula (CMF), particularly in terms of safety and suitability for infants. A multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial found that infants fed GMF showed similar growth and tolerability to those fed CMF, with no increased risk of adverse events.8

Another study confirmed these findings, observing that infants exclusively fed GMF demonstrated similar growth and tolerability to those fed CMF over a 16-week period.9 Importantly, the risk of blood-stained stools in GMF-fed infants reported in previous studies was not observed, providing additional evidence for the safety of GMF.

These studies support the historical view of goat milk as the “universal foster milk,” known for its low allergenicity and better suitability for human metabolism. The preference for GMF may stem from its composition, offering better digestion and overall quality of life for infants.

Other alternatives to consider include:

  1. Donor breast milk from milk banks
  2. Homemade formulas using whole food ingredients (under medical supervision)
  3. Specialized formulas for specific medical conditions, when necessary
  4. Partial breastfeeding combined with safer formula options

A Call to Action: Protecting Our Most Vulnerable

The evidence is clear: breast milk is far superior to formula in every way. Yet, the formula industry continues to thrive, putting profits over the health of infants worldwide. It’s time for a paradigm shift in how we view infant feeding.

We must demand:

  1. Stricter regulation of formula ingredients
  2. Transparent labeling that clearly outlines potential risks
  3. An end to misleading marketing practices
  4. Increased funding for breastfeeding support and education
  5. Workplace policies that accommodate breastfeeding mothers
  6. Public spaces that welcome and support breastfeeding
  7. Healthcare systems that prioritize lactation support
  8. Research into improving formula for cases where it’s medically necessary
  9. A cultural reevaluation of the importance of breastfeeding
  10. Global initiatives to protect and promote breastfeeding, especially in vulnerable populations

Conclusion: Nourishing the Future

The choice between breast milk and formula is not just a matter of feeding preference – it’s a critical decision that impacts the lifelong health of our children. While formula companies continue to push their products as convenient alternatives, the reality is that these synthetic concoctions pale in comparison to the living, perfectly-tailored nutrition of breast milk.

By understanding the risks associated with formula and the unparalleled benefits of breastfeeding, we can make informed decisions for our infants’ health. Moreover, we can advocate for societal changes that support and empower mothers to breastfeed successfully.

It’s time to reclaim our biological birthright and prioritize the health of future generations. After all, there’s simply no improving on nature’s perfect food – breast milk. As we move forward, let’s remember that every drop of breast milk is a gift of health, resilience, and love that no laboratory can replicate.

References

  1. Ji, Sayer. REGENERATE: Unlocking Your Body’s Radical Resilience through the New Biology. Hay House, Inc., 2020.
  2. Ji, Sayer. “Why Is Pesticide Used As An Ingredient In Infant Formula?” GreenMedInfo.com, December 7, 2012. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-pesticide-used-ingredient-infant-formula
  3. Ji, Sayer. “Chemicals As “Nutrients” In “USDA Organic” Infant Formula.” GreenMedInfo.com, March 4, 2012. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/chemicals-nutrients-usda-organic-infant-formula
  4. Brady, June Pauline. “Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world.” Archives of Disease in Childhood97, no. 6 (2012): 529-532.
  5. Carroll, Katherine. “Deep State Investing and The Commodification of Our Children.” GreenMedInfo.com, January 7, 2016. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/deep-state-investing-and-commodification-our-children
  6. Kuchan, Matthew J., et al. “The naturally occurring α-tocopherol stereoisomer RRR-α-tocopherol is predominant in the human infant brain.” British Journal of Nutrition 116, no. 1 (2016): 126-131.
  7. Ji, Sayer. “What Is This Petrochemical “Vitamin” Doing In Infant Brains?” GreenMedInfo.com, June 26, 2016. https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-petrochemical-vitamin-doing-infant-brains
  8. He, T., et al. “Goat Milk Based Infant Formula in Newborns: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial on Growth and Safety.” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition75, no. 2 (2022): 215-220.
  9. Jung, C., et al. “Whole Goat Milk-Based Formula versus Whey-Based Cow Milk Formula: What Formula Do Infants Enjoy More?-A Feasibility, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.” Nutrients

The GMI Research Group (GMIRG) is dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues of the day.  Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health.  Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in which the present condition of the human body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment.